Sabrina Hinz

Nationality: German

Member Association past two years: Volt Germany 

Gender: Female

What do you see as the most urgent democratic challenge facing Volt Europa's mission across the continent, and how would you lead the organisation's response? 

The most urgent democratic challenge is the erosion of trust in politics and democratic institutions. Across Europe, too many people feel unheard, underserved, or excluded from decisions that shape their lives. Volt must respond by living the democracy we want to see: transparent, consistent, and rooted in equality.

I would lead by making Volt’s values visible in our internal culture and external work. That means clear communication, reliable follow-through, and a strong link between the movement and our elected representatives. Our diversity is a strength only if it translates into real belonging and shared purpose. Every mandate we hold should be used as a trust multiplier: local, visible, and accountable. If we prove that politics can be honest, competent, and close to people’s daily realities, we can turn frustration into democratic energy.

How would you handle a public disagreement with your Co-President on a matter of political strategy? 

I would treat public disagreement as a responsibility, not a problem to hide. First, I would create space for a structured discussion with the full board, country council, and national leaders to test both strategies against our goals, values, and practical impact.

My aim would not be to “win” a debate, but to find the strongest solution for Volt and for Europe. I believe leadership means listening seriously, especially when views differ. If I cannot convince a majority of our leadership, I would take that seriously as a signal that my preferred approach may not be the best one. Clear disagreement, handled respectfully, can strengthen trust and improve decisions.

In what way will you ensure the European Board remains accountable to local volunteers and members in practice? Please give 2–3 specific mechanisms. 

I would use three practical mechanisms. First, a weekly open drop-in call at rotating times so members and volunteers can speak directly to me. Second, a monthly small-group breakfast or listening session to create more personal, informal feedback loops. Third, a DEIB Council to review decisions, spot blind spots, and ensure underrepresented perspectives are heard.